Darkslick Shores

Top Performing Decklists

Deck Creator Record Best Finish
Dimir Midrange o_danielakos 9-0 1st in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12763156
Esper Pixie mortadela 5-0 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949
Esper Pixie msmayer 5-0 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949
Dimir Bounce __bmj__ 5-0 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949
Dimir Midrange beno04 5-0 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949

Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)

Win Rate Impact
-2.0%
vs average deck
Top Table Win Rate
72.9%
placement-weighted
Meta Trend
+0.9%
recent vs earlier
Sample Size
236
decks
Tournament Results
62
1st place
99
top 8
Average Copies
3.9
per deck

Meta Performance Analysis

Darkslick Shores ranks #340 out of approximately 339 cards in raw efficiency (top 100%).

Game Impact Factor
76.66
How much this card influences game outcomes
Color Differential
+13.93%

Colorless average: 54.3%

Performance compared to other Colorless cards

Based on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Darkslick Shores is an underperforming card in the current meta.

Recommended number of copies: 1

Win Rate Timeline

Card Efficiency Analysis

Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
68.1
Win percentage points per mana invested
Relative Efficiency
1.00x
Compared to average cards of same mana value

Performance Efficiency: 28.55 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)

At 0 mana, the average win rate in the format is 69.0%. Darkslick Shores has a win rate of 68.1%, making it 1.3% worse than other 0-mana cards.

Top Performing Partners

Card Name Type Deck Count Win Rate 1st Places
Thought-Stalker Warlock Creature — Lizard Warlock 37 78.3% 15
Knight of Grace Creature — Human Knight 51 72.1% 27
Recommission Sorcery 9 70.8% 3
Sorcerous Spyglass Artifact 8 65.0% 3
Essence Scatter Instant 6 64.6% 0
Wilt-Leaf Liege Creature — Elf Knight 78 64.4% 18
Sunpearl Kirin Creature — Kirin 52 64.3% 17
The Mightstone and Weakstone Legendary Artifact — Powerstone 10 64.1% 6
Scavenger Regent Creature — Dragon 6 61.8% 1
Sleight of Hand Sorcery 20 61.7% 4

Card Synergy Analysis

Cards that perform better with Darkslick Shores than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.

Card Name Type Mana Decks Win Rate Together Win Rate Apart Synergy Score
Mazemind Tome Artifact 2 5 73.9% 68.4% +5.5%
Scavenger Regent Creature — Dragon 4 6 70.5% 65.9% +4.5%
Saiba Cryptomancer Creature — Moonfolk Ninja 2 18 76.7% 72.4% +4.3%
Doomsday Excruciator Creature — Demon 6 5 75.0% 71.5% +3.5%
Thought-Stalker Warlock Creature — Lizard Warlock 3 6 69.2% 66.3% +3.0%
Blot Out Instant 3 14 72.5% 69.8% +2.7%
Get Out Instant 2 42 73.3% 70.7% +2.6%
Deadly Cover-Up Sorcery 5 6 70.6% 68.3% +2.3%
Sunpearl Kirin Creature — Kirin 2 52 70.3% 68.6% +1.8%
Three Steps Ahead Instant 1 18 71.2% 70.1% +1.0%

Top Archetypes

Archetype Deck Count % of Archetype Win Rate
Dimir Midrange 2058 99.8% 50.3%
Esper Pixie 1547 100.0% 53.8%
Dimir Bounce 491 100.0% 49.3%
Dimir Demons 102 100.0% 50.7%
Dimir Control 71 97.3% 53.4%

Statistics Explanation

Statistic Description Formula
Win Rate Impact How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks)
Top Table Win Rate A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight)
Meta Trend Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period)
Confidence Factor A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). log10(Number of decks + 1)
Average Copies The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks)
Card Synergy Score Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates)
Raw Efficiency Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. (Win rate) / (Mana value)
Relative Efficiency How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value)
Performance Efficiency Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value)
Game Impact Factor A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100)
Color Differential How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. Win rate - Average win rate for same color

All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.