Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
---|---|---|---|
Dimir Midrange | o_danielakos | 9-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12763156 |
Esper Pixie | mortadela | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
Esper Pixie | msmayer | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
Dimir Bounce | __bmj__ | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
Dimir Midrange | beno04 | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
4 Color Repurposing , 5 Color Legends , Azorius Synthesizer , Azorius Tempo , Dimir Bounce , Dimir Cauldron , Dimir Control , Dimir Demons , Dimir Descend
Darkslick Shores ranks #340 out of approximately 339 cards in raw efficiency (top 100%).
Colorless average: 54.3%
Performance compared to other Colorless cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Darkslick Shores is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Performance Efficiency: 28.55 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 0 mana, the average win rate in the format is 69.0%. Darkslick Shores has a win rate of 68.1%, making it 1.3% worse than other 0-mana cards.
Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
---|---|---|---|---|
Thought-Stalker Warlock | Creature — Lizard Warlock | 37 | 78.3% | 15 |
Knight of Grace | Creature — Human Knight | 51 | 72.1% | 27 |
Recommission | Sorcery | 9 | 70.8% | 3 |
Sorcerous Spyglass | Artifact | 8 | 65.0% | 3 |
Essence Scatter | Instant | 6 | 64.6% | 0 |
Wilt-Leaf Liege | Creature — Elf Knight | 78 | 64.4% | 18 |
Sunpearl Kirin | Creature — Kirin | 52 | 64.3% | 17 |
The Mightstone and Weakstone | Legendary Artifact — Powerstone | 10 | 64.1% | 6 |
Scavenger Regent | Creature — Dragon | 6 | 61.8% | 1 |
Sleight of Hand | Sorcery | 20 | 61.7% | 4 |
Cards that perform better with Darkslick Shores than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mazemind Tome | Artifact | 2 | 5 | 73.9% | 68.4% | +5.5% |
Scavenger Regent | Creature — Dragon | 4 | 6 | 70.5% | 65.9% | +4.5% |
Saiba Cryptomancer | Creature — Moonfolk Ninja | 2 | 18 | 76.7% | 72.4% | +4.3% |
Doomsday Excruciator | Creature — Demon | 6 | 5 | 75.0% | 71.5% | +3.5% |
Thought-Stalker Warlock | Creature — Lizard Warlock | 3 | 6 | 69.2% | 66.3% | +3.0% |
Blot Out | Instant | 3 | 14 | 72.5% | 69.8% | +2.7% |
Get Out | Instant | 2 | 42 | 73.3% | 70.7% | +2.6% |
Deadly Cover-Up | Sorcery | 5 | 6 | 70.6% | 68.3% | +2.3% |
Sunpearl Kirin | Creature — Kirin | 2 | 52 | 70.3% | 68.6% | +1.8% |
Three Steps Ahead | Instant | 1 | 18 | 71.2% | 70.1% | +1.0% |
Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
---|---|---|---|
Dimir Midrange | 2058 | 99.8% | 50.3% |
Esper Pixie | 1547 | 100.0% | 53.8% |
Dimir Bounce | 491 | 100.0% | 49.3% |
Dimir Demons | 102 | 100.0% | 50.7% |
Dimir Control | 71 | 97.3% | 53.4% |
Statistic | Description | Formula |
---|---|---|
Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.